Which ethical decision-making framework involves assessing consequences?

• A. Kantianism
• B. Altruism
• C. Utilitarianism
• D. Virtue Ethics

Answer: (C)

Utilitarianism is an ethical decision-making framework that evaluates the moral worth of an action based on its outcomes or consequences. This approach posits that the most ethical choice is the one that results in the greatest overall good or the least harm for the greatest number of people. This consequentialist perspective contrasts with other ethical theories that prioritize intentions, duties, or character traits over the results of actions.

In utilitarianism, decision-makers analyze the potential benefits and drawbacks of different choices to determine which action would lead to the most favorable outcome. This framework is especially relevant in situations where the impact of decisions can affect many individuals, as it emphasizes the collective well-being rather than just individual rights or responsibilities.

Kantianism, altruism, and virtue ethics involve different considerations. Kantianism focuses on adherence to moral duties and principles, regardless of the outcomes. Altruism centers on selfless concern for the welfare of others, while virtue ethics emphasizes moral character and the qualities of the individual making the decision rather than just the consequences of their actions.